Showing posts with label NY Giants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NY Giants. Show all posts

Sunday, February 05, 2012

The Super Bowl XLVI

In case you aren't aware, the Cowboys aren't in the game, so it makes me struggle some to care. It is especially hard to care when you find that the Giants are there instead.


The match up is the NY Giants and the New England Patriots, or as some would like to say, Eli Manning vs. Tom Brady, although you won't find Tom Brady sacking Eli Manning. That would be entertaining considering they are both the quarterbacks. That would make for a great commercial. Anyway. Moving on. 

I like the Patriots for this. I'll just come right out and say it. Between these two teams, that's who I'll be rooting for in this game. Come tomorrow, I'll be rooting for the Cowboys. My heart just isn't in this game. Eli Manning is probably the luckiest quarterback right now, and I just wonder if his luck is going to continue today or are we actually going to see some skill this fine Super Bowl Sunday.

Sticking to tradition, I'll throw down some points. Let's say: Patriots over Giants, 27-16. 


Fanzz.com

Friday, October 22, 2010

Giants: Dallas Still Dangerous

I just read that the Giants are worried about the Cowboys, although, I don't know why. Every time the Cowboys take the field, their biggest opponent does at the same time. They are their biggest enemy. They beat themselves week after week, where it be a missed field goal which should be money, or a penalty that adds ten yards, plus negating the touchdown they would've scored on the play... they create ways to lose. I don't know if I am going to give an official posting of the prediction of the game, if anything, I can simply save myself the trouble and say that if the Cowboys do not turn it over and keep the penalties to minimum, they will win. Do I think they will? Not a chance.

Forecast: Giants win this one, 31-21.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Dallas Cowboys Update

By Ryan Cook

Mall of America Field has always been well known for its hostile fans, and although the Dallas Cowboys are more than familiar with this fact following their trip to Minnesota last season, it was evident from the very beginning on Sunday that Tony Romo and Wade Phillips' offense were in for a tough day.

On the scoreboard, Dallas fared quite nicely. The end result was far from impressive for the Cowboys, but as the 21-24 scoreline suggests, the Boys in Blue did give it there all.

But like the Cowboys so clearly knew heading into Week 6's blockbuster matchup, one team was a surefire pick to wind up as the ultimate loser.

Unfortunately for Cowboy fans, their team felt the wrath of Minnesota yet again. Given that the scoreline wasn't as big a blowout as it was back in January, Dallas now find themselves in a 1-4 hole that is looking near impossible to climb out of.

To be perfectly frank here, if the Texas Rangers weren't doing so well in the ALCS against the New York Yankees, we would all be hearing a lot more verbal concern in regards to America's team.

Still, sooner or later, the Cowboys are going to cop the criticism they deserve. While most analysts have already written the Cowboys out of postseason action, many people are yet to criticize Dallas, even though the realistic thought would be to jump on the hate bandwagon as soon as possible.

On the positive side for Jerry Jones, Tony Romo played a decent game. As untimely as his two interceptions were, Romo's 220 yards and three touchdowns acted as one of the sole reasons for the Cowboys potential win chances.

In the coming weeks, the Cowboys face tough tests against the likes of the New York Giants and Green Bay Packers. Both of these games are doable, but with a performance like Sunday Night, the Cowboys aren't exactly winning themselves any favoritism votes right now.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Chicago Bears (1-0) at Dallas Cowboys (0-1)

All I can say is that I would like both teams to win... and, of course, when I was watching that last three seconds of the fourth quarter, I ended up going through a whole mess of emotions that simply cannot be summed up into words. We went from a win to a loss in a matter of seconds... and it was our own fault, which is like salt in the wound. Salt in a gunshot wound. And the wound is self-inflicted...

So, after one game, the stats look as follows:
Tony Romo282 Yards66.0%1 TD - 0 INT
Marian Barber39 Yards8 Carries0 TD
Felix Jones38 Yards8 Carries0 TD
Miles Austin146 Yards10 Catches1 TD
Dez Bryant 56 Yards8 Catches0 TD
DeMarcus Ware 6 Tackles0 FF1 Sack
What this means is this: Romo is on pace for 4,512 yards (It's possible, and I'll take that), Miles Austin is on pace for 2,336 yards (won't happen), and that the Cowboys have NNNNOOOO rushing game and are trying to trade Choice. Dez Bryant has shown that he has game.

Here are the concerns about the Cowboys:


* 5/13 on third down.
* 12 Penalties for 91 Yards


The 38.5% on third down isn't going to blow teams away and it really won't win you a lot of games. Now, if you are getting 38.5% on third down but averaging two third downs per game, ROCK ON. But with 13 third downs, you gotta convert more than five.

The Cowboys rank second in penalties, with only the Jets being tagged for more (14 for 125 yards). As far as yardage is concerned, there are three teams with more yards penalized (Jets, Bears, Giants). This game could see a LOT of penalties come Sunday. I... can't... wait. There's nothing I love more than litter on the field.

Now, the Bears look like this:
Jay Cutler372 Yards65.7%2 TD - 1 INT
Matt Forte50 Yards17 Carries0 TD
Matt Forte151 Yards7 Catches2 TD
Devin Aromashodu71 Yards5 Catches0 TD
Brian Urlacher 8 Tackles0 FF1 Sack
Lance Briggs 10 Tackles0 FF1 Deflection

Jay Cutler looked good in that game. He's on pace for close to 6,000 yards, which will not happen. In fact, I honestly expect him to get picked off twice in the game against the Cowboys. Why? I don't know, I just have that weird feeling that it will. I want to say there will be three pickoffs on Cutler Sunday.

Cutler also got sacked four times against the Lions and I don't think the Cowboys will sack Cutler that many, more like two. DeMarcus Ware will be playing, so two seems completely possible. The key to Dallas winning really relies on what happens with containing Matt Forte and making sure Cutler doesn't explode again. Can the 'Boys do it, while Romo stays Romo and plays catch with Austin and Bryant?

Forecast: To answer said question, I think the Cowboys can take care of Forte and Cutler enough. I will even go on to say that Romo will play a good game of catch with Austin, Bryant, and Jason Witten. In fact, if Witten doesn't get more catches Sunday, the Cowboys will be in jeopardy of losing. If Witten grabs six catches, then I think the Cowboys win it hands down. Will Witten catch six? Probably not. Will he catch four? Yes. Is four enough? I think so. Prediction: Cowboys win in a close one and move to 1-1 with a score of 21-17.

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Owners Not Believable When Crying Poverty

The players, we all get.

Doesn't take a nuclear physicist to know there's something wrong with guys like Ryan Howard or Joe Mauer pocketing $1 million or so every two weeks to play a kid's game. Easy to understand that a role player on the Orlando Magic getting $19 million over three years is terribly out of whack with today's economic realities.

Obscene salaries haven't ruined sports, but they've taken some of the fun from them. We're reminded every time a player switches teams for more money that it's a business more than a game.

All along, though, we were secure in the knowledge that the owners had plenty to pay them with. These are all rich guys, after all, who mostly got that way because they knew ways to make money none of us has figured out.

That's why NFL fans are often held hostage to pay thousands just for the right to buy a seat. It's why the Yankees can build the most expensive baseball stadium ever, then charge the most expensive prices to sit in it.

Apparently they're not as smart as we think. Turns out they've been giving away the store all along.

They're crying poverty in NBA, warning of dire times in the NFL. Things are so bad they're willing to cancel games, even seasons, to restore some sanity to their payrolls.

We've seen this act before. The NHL canceled an entire season just to gain control over player salaries that owners contended were bankrupting the league.

But that was hockey, and not many people noticed. Come next year they will, though, with lockouts possible in both the NFL and NBA.

The campaign has already begun on both sides to hold the other responsible for any disruption of play. In that competition, owners will always have the upper hand because most fans think millionaire players are overpaid anyway.

Just to make sure, though, the leagues are starting to step up their game.

In Green Bay, home of the only publicly owned NFL team, Packers executives blamed escalating salaries this week for the team's profit dropping to $9.8 million over the last year. Player costs are rising faster than revenues, they warned, a trend that even bloated television contracts can't make up for.

Barely mentioned, though, was that the team has $127 million in the bank and that the team could almost pay its $161 million in player costs without selling a ticket because of its share of the league's national television and advertising contracts. Not mentioned at all is that the Packers are the smallest of the small-market teams and don't have nearly the local revenue of, say, the New York Giants or Dallas Cowboys, yet were still able to turn a profit.

The Indiana Pacers, meanwhile, are apparently so desperate for cash that they got the city to agree this week to give them $10 million a year to help maintain Conseco Fieldhouse. That's the same arena Indiana taxpayers built for billionaire owner Herb Simon to begin with so his team would have a nice place to play downtown.

The place where the Golden State Warriors play in Oakland isn't nearly as nice. But that didn't stop new owners from getting in a bidding war and paying a league record $450 million a few days ago to buy the team — nearly four times what it sold for just 15 years earlier.

An astonishing investment considering NBA commissioner David Stern claims that owners will lose nearly $400 million this year alone in his league.

There are also a lot of other bidders standing in line trying to buy the Texas Rangers. And, if an NFL team ever came on the market, billionaires would be sharpening their elbows to get a piece of the action.

Indeed, at the same time owners are crying poverty, others are waiting in line ready to take their place. Even in a down economy there's no shortage of potential buyers for even the dowdiest of franchises.

It's easy to see why. Owning a big sports franchise is the ultimate ego trip (see Jerry Jones) that can instantly transform the average billionaire into a prominent community leader (see the new owner of the Chicago Cubs).

And while they may not be cash cows year to year, they do make money. Not only that, the franchises of the major sports come with guaranteed income streams from lucrative national television contracts.

Not every owner makes out like the late George Steinbrenner, who parlayed an $8.7 million investment into a franchise worth $1.6 billion. But team values have been rising steadily for the better part of the last two decades, and there's no reason to think they won't continue to appreciate.

That being said, you can still expect to hear owners crying poor over the upcoming months. There will be somber talk about the terrible consequences of not reining in player salaries in new collective bargaining agreements.

Feel their pain, if you must. But start believing them about the same time they start unloading their teams.

Tim Dahlberg

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

10 Decisions ESPN Should Show Next

By Lance Pauker

Last Thursday at 9 p.m. EST, the atmosphere suddenly and inexplicably exploded. It was later found that this cataclysmic event was caused by a little-known special held on ESPN about some guy named LeBron James. Apparently he's a big deal or something. Jim Gray was there, so it must have been pretty important.

The event had even higher ratings than Jim Rome Is Burning, something previously thought impossible by that German Octopus dude, who is apparently a more reliable prophet than Dan Gilbert. Because the LeBron reality show was a bigger hit than "Dream Job," ESPN's previous crack at reality TV, it has been rumored that the sports media giant is looking for new "decisions" to air.

These rumors can by no means be confirmed, but someone from somewhere tweeted something that seemed important, so I figured I may include it. Without further ado, here are the 10 decisions that ESPN should show next.

Monday, May 17, 2010

Giants, Jets sign bid to bring Super Bowl to NJ

By DAVID PORTER Associated Press Writer

Blankets, seat-warmers and earmuffs could compete with hats and T-shirts as must-have Super Bowl souvenirs if the owners of the New York area's two NFL teams woo football's ultimate game to the region in 2014.

"We'll be lucky if it snows," Jets owner Woody Johnson quipped Wednesday at a news conference marking the official signing of the bid package that will be delivered to the league's other 30 owners.

The theme of the new Meadowlands Stadium's bid is "Make Some History," and if the stadium is awarded the game, it will be the first Super Bowl to be played outdoors in a cold-weather locale. Miami and Tampa, which have hosted 14 Super Bowls between them, also are submitting bids. The owners will pick the Super Bowl site at the NFL meetings in Dallas on May 25.

Johnson, stadium chief executive Mark Lamping and New York Giants co-owners Steve Tisch and John Mara extolled the advantages of playing the game in the New York area, but they also acknowledged they will have to get other owners to revise their vision of the Super Bowl as a game that can only be played in bikini weather or in a climate-controlled dome.

"Sports fans aren't easily intimidated by weather," Lamping said on an unseasonably cool, drizzly day at the new stadium. "The game of football was never intended to be played in perfect conditions."

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Bears Sign Peppers; Rolle Becomes Richest Safety

By RACHEL COHEN AP Sports Writer


The Chicago Bears were big spenders as NFL teams entered the free agency period unconstrained by a salary cap, signing top prize Julius Peppers.

The New York Giants also got in on the action Friday, making Pro Bowler Antrel Rolle the richest safety in the league in the waning hours of the opening day of free agency.

Miami and Atlanta were also active, with the Dolphins agreeing to terms with Rolle's former Arizona teammate, linebacker Karlos Dansby, and the Falcons and cornerback Dunta Robinson also coming to terms.

The Bears also added running back Chester Taylor from Minnesota and blocking tight end Brandon Manumaleuna from San Diego.

Sunday, January 04, 2009

Divisional Playoff Brackets

Divisional Games:

  • Saturday: Baltimore at Tennessee (3:30 CST)
  • Saturday: Arizona at Carolina (7:15 CST)
  • Sunday: Philadelphia at NY Giants (Noon CST)
  • Sunday: San Diego at Pittsburgh (3:45 CST)

Quickpicks? Baltimore, Carolina, Giants and Steelers.

Home Field

Monday, December 29, 2008

NFL Playoffs 2009

How will the playoffs go? Well... let's see the obvious.

  • Titans will be one and done.
  • Vikings will drop the wild-card game, thus sending the Eagles to play against the Giants.
  • Arizona will also will be one and done.
  • Panthers take out the Falcons.
  • Giants vs. the Eagles... I will take the Giants, although I am tempted to pick the Eagles.
  • Ravens vs. Dolphins... I am trying to care. Ravens have a better team. Ravens.
  • Colts vs. Chargers... Chargers.
That's going to be the extent for now. I'm still sick from the Cowboys loss.

Home Field

Friday, December 26, 2008

Game 16: NY Giants vs. Vikings

The Giants have clinched a bye... they are 12-3 and this game means something... to the Vikings. The Vikings, who are 9-6, need a win to clinch a playoff birth. A loss would give a lot of ground to the Bears, who are also looking at this game in need of the playoffs.

Quarterback Comparison
NameQB RatingComp-AttComp %YardsTD-IntFumbles

Eli Manning

86.9

278-460

60.4%

3,119

21-10

5

Gus Frerotte

73.7

178-301

59.1%

2,157

12-15

4

Manning is the better QB, as Frerotte has more interceptions and TDs.
Rushing Comparison
NameCarriesYardsTDsCatches

Yards

TDs

Brandon Jacobs

219

1,089

15

6

36

0

Derrick Ward

167

948

2

39

370

0

Adrian Peterson

342

1,657

9

21

125

0

The first two are the Giants and Peterson, as you should know, is a Viking. Comparing one back to another, the Vikings have the better back, but the Giants have the better rushing game.
Receiving Comparison
NameCatchesYardsTDsFumbles

Amani Toomer

46

564

4

1

Steve Smith

55

554

1

1

Domenik Hixon

39

534

1

0

Bernard Berrian

44

883

6

0

Visanthe Shiancoe

40

582

7

0

Bobby Wade

49

547

2

2

I would have to say that the Vikings appear to have the better receivers... at least on paper. Manning almost has 1,000 yards more passing that Frerotte, so I would've pegged them to have the better numbers. Interesting...
Defense Comparison
NameTacklesSacksInts-TDDeflections

Antonio Pierce

90

1.0

0-0

2

Justin Tuck

64

12.0

1-1

1

Corey Webster

50

1.0

3-0

23

Chad Greenway

108

5.0

0-0

5

Jared Allen

50

14.5

0-0

3

Kevin Williams

58

8.5

0-0

5

Aaron Ross also has three interceptions for the Giants, with one returned for a TD. Jared Allen has two safeties for the Vikings. I do question the pass defense for the Vikings. There aren't any strong standouts when you look at the numbers. Antoine Winfield does have 10 deflections and Cedric Griffin adds 14 more. There isn't anyone with more than 2 interceptions, though and the Vikings haven't returned a pick for a touch.

Intangibles: 1) Home Game to the Vikings. 2) Frerotte's 15 interceptions gives a passing defense edge to the Giants. I am sure if I thought hard enough, I could come up with more, but those two were the only ones to pop up off the top of my head.
Forecast: I like the Giants in this one. They don't have much to play for, but I do not think they will let this one simply slide for the Vikings. It is almost like they can flex their playoff muscles heading into the bye. Score: 31-20.

Friday, February 01, 2008

New England vs. New York

I guess you can say that this is a "New" Super Bowl and that it would be England vs. York, all New! OK, I know, "YAWN"... So, I've been thinking of just how AWESOME it would be for the Giants to upset the Patriots in the 'Bowl. How can they do it? Well, coaches feel that if their team can win two fo the three sides of the game (Offense, Defense, Special Teams), they will win. Let's immediately give the Patriots the offense. That would mean that the Giants need to take out the defense and special teams to walk away "da champs". And honestly, I think the Giants have the better special teams anyway. So, the game is all centered around the Giants defense. Can they have the better squad out there on Sunday? Well, I don't think so. But what if they step up? Here's a fifth seeded team (third best record in the NFC), winning three on the road to get here to the Supe. They can definitely play. Realistically, the Patriots are going to win, and more than likely, win big: probably something in the range of 38-17. The Patriots have hadd plenty of time to prepare and the Giants expectations are probably as high as a worms belly. I guess the only pressure out there is on the Patriots, which mean that could give the Giants some momentum, since if they lose, well they were expected to lose. If they win, they become the upset team of the century. I mean, they beat the team who was undefeated at 18-0 in the Super Bowl! How cool is that? New York can not underperform. When you walk into the Super Bowl with an expectation to be blown out, the only way you can go is up, right?

And it all hinges on whether the Giants defense can step up and provide pressure, enough to cause a disruption of Brady and hold the Patriots to under 30 points. If the Giants can hold the Patriots under 25 points, the Giants should win, or at least the defense has done their part. The special teams for the Giants just simply need to provide good enough field position to give the Giants a fair chance to score, and that shouldn't be a problem. If special teams scores a TD straight out, then that would only be two touchdowns for the offense to crank out and two field goals to push the Giants to a score of 27 points. Is that possible? Yes. But the defense has to hold the Patriots under 25 points to work. And I really don't think that will happen... BUT I SURE HOPE IT DOES!!!

Monday, January 21, 2008

Super Bowl Matchup

Well... the Giants win THREE road games to get the big game - and they did lose to the Patriots at the end of the regular season... could they lose to the Patriots to end their playoff run? Well, I think the Giants, who have beaten the Cowboys on the road and the PACKERS on the road in below zero temperature, will be a SUPER Surprise on Super Sunday. Look for the Giants to win the 'Bowl with a score of 31-27. I will add a few things to this post as the game approaches. Johnny Out.

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

NFC after 9 games played

A Look at Football:

NFC East:
Cowboys (6-3)
Giants (6-3)
‘Skins (5-4)

NFC North:
Chicago (6-3)

NFC South:
Carolina (7-2)
Atlanta (6-3)
T Bay (6-3)

NFC West:
Seattle (7-2)

Eagles are pretty much out of the running at this point. Playoffs? I don’t even think they will go post this year.

Cowboys face off against Detroit (4-5), Denver (7-2), NY Giants (6-3), Kansas City (5-4), Washington (5-4), Carolina (7-2), and St. Louis (4-5), so the strength of their opponents schedule is that of a 38-25 mark. If the opponents uphold that winning percentage, the Cowboys will go 3-4 in the last seven and finish 9-7. If the Cowboys maintain their current winning percentage, they will go either 10-6 or 11-5.

The Giants, on the other hand, their remaining opponents have a 34-29 record, and if that holds true, then they should go 3-4 in their last seven, but more likely will win more than that. Realistically, I think the Giants have the upper hand the rest of the way, and the stats don’t lie. They do have the upper hand.

The Redskins pose an interesting thing. Their remaining opponents winning percentage is that of 47.62% or a record of 30-33. They are pretty much a shoe in for 4 games, and realistically, they can go 5-2 the rest of the way.

Chicago is pretty much in ink for the postseason, as is Seattle. Both are tops in their divisions, and no other team is above 5.

Carolina is my favorite for the South, but I am biased. Tampa is overrated. They can beat the bad teams, but no one with punch. For Tampa, numbers say they will win 3 of the last 7, but I think that is optimistic. I look at how they lost to San Francisco and were killed by the Cats; I think that with the strength of their schedule, they will be lucky to win 3. Look for Tampa to finish 8-8.

Carolina is going up against the Bears this coming Sunday. 5 of their last 7 games they play someone with a 6-3 mark. Should they split those, they could go 4-3 or 5-2, so maybe 11-5 or 12-4 at season end. Catch a bye and see them in the Division series? Most likely.

Atlanta is much like Dallas, a hard road ahead of itself. Same schedule strength, in that their opponents hold a 38-25 mark, but unlike Dallas, the records are more lopsided. Look for Atlanta to go 3-4 the rest of the way and finish 9-7, beating Detroit, Tampa once, and New Orleans.

Playoffs for the NFC:
NFC East:
Giants 10-6 (Wildcard)
Redskins 10-6 (Wildcard)
Cowboys 10-6 (Division Winner)

NFC North:
Chicago (In by Default)

NFC West:
Seattle (In by Default)

NFC South:
Carolina 11-5 (Division Winner)
Atlanta 9-7 (Doesn’t Go)
Tampa Bay 8-8 (Doesn’t Go)

Hopefully tomorrow I can do up the AFC. This was fun! Johnny Out.